|
術(shù)中肺開放通氣策略降低腹腔鏡結(jié)直腸癌切除術(shù)后并發(fā)癥:一項隨機對照試驗術(shù)中肺開放通氣策略降低腹腔鏡結(jié)直腸癌切除術(shù)后并發(fā)癥:一項隨機對照試驗 貴州醫(yī)科大學(xué) 麻醉與心臟電生理課題組 翻譯:佟睿 編輯:陳銳 審校:曹瑩 背景 術(shù)中機械通氣中 聯(lián)合應(yīng)用 呼氣末正壓(PEEP)和肺復(fù)張(LRM)(稱為 肺開放 策略,OLS)的作用尚不清楚。 目的 旨在于 確定中等PEEP(6-8cmH 2 O)和重復(fù) 性 LRM s 的開肺策略是否能預(yù)防低潮氣量下腹腔鏡結(jié)直腸癌切除術(shù)高;颊咝g(shù)后并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生。 試驗設(shè)計 一項前瞻性、評估者盲法、隨機對照試驗。 范圍設(shè)置 于2017年1月至2018年10月在單中心的大學(xué)附屬醫(yī)院進行。 干預(yù)因素 將患者隨機分為兩組(1:1),PEEP為6~8cmH2O,LRMs每30min重復(fù)一次(OLS組)和不加LRMs的PEEP為零(非OLS組)。 主要觀察指標(biāo)測定 主要 觀察指標(biāo) 是術(shù)后7天內(nèi)發(fā)生 的 肺 及 肺外 的主要 并發(fā)癥。次要 觀察指標(biāo) 包括術(shù)中潛在的有害低血壓和血管 升壓藥的需求 。 結(jié)果 每組共130名患者被納入初步結(jié)果分析。有24例(18.5%)和43例(33.1%)發(fā)生了主要結(jié)果事件[相對危險度為0.46;95%可信區(qū)間為0.26~0.82;P = 0.009]。有更多的患者出現(xiàn)潛在的危害性低血壓( OLS組 vs非 OLS ,15%vs 4.3%;P = 0.004),并且需要血管升壓劑(25% vs 8.6%;P<0.001)。 結(jié)論 在低潮氣量通氣下接受腹腔鏡結(jié)直腸癌切除術(shù)的高危患者中,PEEP為6-8cmH2O并重復(fù)LRM s 的 肺開放 策略與使用零PEEP 且 不使用LRM s 的策略相比,減少了術(shù)后并發(fā)癥。值得注意的是,在血流動力學(xué)不穩(wěn)定的患者中應(yīng)謹(jǐn)慎使用LRM s 。 原始文獻來源 Hong LiM, Zhi-Nan ZhengM, Nan-Rong Zhang , et al. Intra-operative open-lung ventilatory strategy reduces postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection : A randomised controlled trial.[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol2021;38:1042–1051 . Intra-operative open-lung ventilatory strategy reduces postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: A randomised controlled trial Abstract BACKGROUND The role of the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) combination (termed open-lung strategy, OLS) during intraoperative mechanical ventilation is not clear. OBJECTIVETo determine whether an open-lung strategy constituting medium PEEP (6–8 cmH2O) and repeated LRMs protects against postoperative complications in at-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection under low-tidal-volume ventilation. DESIGN A prospective, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial. SETTING Single university-affiliated hospital, conducted from January 2017 to October 2018. PATIENTSA total of 280 patients at risk of pulmonary complications, scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection under general anaesthesia and low-tidal-volume (6–8 ml kg-1 predicted body weight) ventilation. INTERVENTION The patients were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to a PEEP of 6–8 cmH2O with LRMs repeated every 30 min (OLS group) or a zero PEEP without LRMs (non-OLS group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was a composite of major pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications occurring within 7 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes included intra-operative potentially harmful hypotension and the need for vasopressors. RESULTS A total of 130 patients from each group were included in the primary outcome analysis. Primary outcome events occurred in 24 patients (18.5%) in the OLS group and 43 patients (33.1%) in the non-OLS group [relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidenceinterval(CI),0.26to0.82;P=0.009). More patients in the OLS group developed potentially harmful hypotension (OLS vs. non-OLS, 15% vs. 4.3%; P=0.004) and needed vasopressors (25% vs. 8.6%; P<0.001). CONCLUSION Among at-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection under low-tidal-volume ventilation, an open-lung strategy with a PEEP of 6–8 cmH2O and repeated LRMs reduced postoperative complications compared with a strategy using zero PEEP without LRMs. Of note, LRMs should be used with caution in patients with haemodynamic instability. |